Daniel Nouri's Old Blog

After finding out about plone.recipe.bundlecheckout yesterday, I thought I'd mention infrae.subversion, a similar recipe for zc.buildout. These are the key differences:

• p.r.bundlecheckout allows you to specify one URL per part, whereas with infrae.subversion you can specify a list of URLs. Why does this matter? Because it helps you keep the exact URLs and therefore versions of the components that you use in your buildout configuration, which is better than keeping them in a svn:externals property.

• infrae.subversion takes care not to wipe any changes that you might have done in the checkout. That is, you can safely use its checkouts for development.

  Why not instead make a separate products directory and use svn:externals for development? Because again, we want to keep all dependencies in the buildout configuration. And it's good to keep the development buildout as close as possible to the deployment one, to minimize the chance of error. With infrae.subversion, you also have the advantage of being able to run bin/buildout and have all dependencies updated, instead of having to run svn up in some directory manually, which is a source of confusion.

• p.r.bundlecheckout works with both SVN and CVS, while infrae.subversion only works with SVN.

The Silva buildout is an example of a buildout that uses infrae.subversion.

[my-products]
recipe = infrae.subversion
urls =
  https://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/FCKeditor/trunk FCKeditor
  ...

[prep-fckeditor]
recipe = plone.recipe.command
command =
    ${buildout:executable} ${buildout:directory}/parts/my-products/FCKeditor/utils/base2zope.py
update-command = ${prep-fckeditor:command}